Why Valora?

Why Valora Was Conceived.

During 2025 and 2026, colleagues across our professional network reported growing community pushback against data-center projects across the United States. That prompted us to study the market and understand the concerns driving the opposition.

We started by listening

Community questions make projects better.

A data center is more than a building full of computers. It needs reliable power, cooling, water, land, backup systems and supporting infrastructure. Communities understandably want to know how those demands will affect their electricity, water, roads, noise and quality of life.

Governments are responding with new requirements for power connections, water use, emissions, noise, construction and public reporting.

This is where Valora may help. Valora aims to recover heat from the data center and use it to treat impaired water. Instead of simply throwing that heat away, a project may turn it into fresh water that benefits the surrounding community.

Valora is one part of the conversation. Projects still need their own work on grid, water, permits, construction and community commitments.

Six questions

What communities reasonably need to understand.

These questions come up in planning. What happens at a site depends on its equipment, size, location, permits and how it operates.

Public outcomes

Different records, different outcomes.

These examples show conditions, reviews, redesigns and unresolved objections. They are not templates for every location or a finding about a Valora project.

RecordPublicly established outcomeRelease-safe lesson
Ireland · CRU connection policyConnection policy considers location, renewable, flexibility and system factors in light of security-of-supply and network constraints.Grid connection can be conditional and location-specific.
Chile · Cerrillos Data CenterThe environmental court required reconsideration of climate-change effects on the water component; a redesign proposal removed planned groundwater use.Water concern can drive redesign and further review.
Phoenix area · field studyMeasured downwind warming was reported at sampled operating facilities under the study conditions.One field study is not a universal data-centre heat-island claim.
Loudoun County · noise processPre-construction and post-occupancy noise studies are required for data centres.Noise needs a measurable boundary and verification.
St. Louis · conditional permitConditions addressed heat reporting, equipment enclosure, generator testing and public commitments.Specific permit conditions are more meaningful than generic promises.
Cape Town · reported objectionObjectors sought fuller disclosure; the City stated the application still required evaluation.This is an unresolved objection, not a finding of impact or denial.
Morrow County · development routeA traffic-impact analysis and construction-traffic coordination were required.Construction impacts require project-specific planning.

Where Valora can help

Where Valora could help — and where it cannot.

Valora starts with clear facts about a site’s heat, water and permits.

It could look at

Whether heat from computer cooling could be used for a real job.

It could look at

Whether suitable non-drinking water could be treated with a clear plan for water quality, treatment, leftovers and heat.

It cannot decide

Whether grid capacity, cost, backup power, noise, air, land or traffic work for a site. Those are local project and permit decisions.

Public sources

Issue sources and status.

Direct public sources supporting the mechanisms and records described above. Accessed 28 October 2026.

  1. LBNL · 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage ReportSystem demand, scenarios and water context
  2. Ireland Commission for Regulation of UtilitiesData-centre electricity-connection policy
  3. Virginia JLARC · Data Centers in VirginiaStatewide public audit
  4. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionLarge-load review framework
  5. U.S. DOE · Cooling-water efficiencyCooling pathways and water-efficiency context
  6. Chile SEA · environmental-assessment criterionLocation-sensitive power and water design
  7. Chile Environmental Court · Cerrillos Data CenterWater-component review record
  8. ASME · Phoenix local-temperature field studyMeasured case-specific observations
  9. European Commission · energy performance of data centresHeat-reuse and performance context
  10. Loudoun County · noise and air-quality concernsVerification and process requirements
  11. U.S. EPA · stationary-source resourcesSource-specific air-permitting context
  12. City of St. Louis · conditional permit recordProject-specific heat, equipment and generator conditions
  13. Massachusetts Executive Order 658Responsible-development expectations
  14. UK Local Government AssociationLocalized planning considerations
  15. Morrow County · June 2025 recordTraffic-analysis and coordination condition
  16. Environment Agency · Avonmouth consultationPublic consultation record

These public sources support general mechanisms, reported records and project-specific outcomes. They do not establish a Valora performance result, an impact finding for a particular site, an affiliation or an endorsement.